The meeting  aimed to  give the NSPA the  chance to present  their  views on the  ongoing  revise  of the EU Arctic Policy and provide input regarding the  renewal  of the EU Arctic  Strategy from 2016.  Michael Mann,  who is a part  of the process  of  European  External Action Service (EEAS)  together  with the  European Commission,  informed the meeting  that the  ongoing  activities  launched by the Commission, along with the public  consultation,  will form the basis for the EU Arctic Policy. 

Nils-Olov Lindfors, NSPA´s chairman, and Norrbotten´s regional Councilor started by presenting the NSPA's views on the Arctic. Lindfors  highlighted that the Arctic is an area of interest for future investment with well-developed cross-border cooperation. It is also an area with several technical solutions and refinement of natural resources, as well as active forestry in which will be important for the implementation of the European Green Deal. 

Tomas Norvoll, regional councillor in Nordland, Norway, emphasized the importance of the EU even though Norway is not a member country due to Norway's exports and the geopolitical situation with Russia as a prominent neighbour country. Moreover,  Norvoll stresses that the NSPA regions are facing challenges with an aging population and a decreasing population. The consequences are a deterioration of the security in the Arctic, as people are required to live, work, and operate in the region to keep it safe and alive. 

Michael Mann announced that the European Commission is now summarizing the ambitions for the new EU Arctic policy, and emphasized the importance of a continued, mutual dialogue between the EU and the NSPA. He also pointed out that the NSPA works as a guide for the European Green Deal. However, there is a perception that developments in the Arctic are not sufficient, which has brought up the question of how to contribute to sustainable development in the NSPA in a greater extent. Although, with the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the EU there is a risk that the Northern  Periphery and the Arctic program are becoming much smaller, or even  disappearing. It is therefore necessary to put pressure to maintain the funds. Mann also emphasized the need for more concrete examples of the challenges regarding infrastructure in the Arctic. 

NSPA´s view on the new EU Arctic Policy  

The lack of infrastructure is a dilemma for the development  in the NSPA, as well as  for  the European Arctic, which the EU should  consider. In northern Sweden, northern  Finland and northern Norway, increased transport options are needed, such as the double-track railway between Narvik and Kiruna, which is currently a bottleneck for the export of minerals and fish. In northern Finland, people cannot take advantage of the opportunities of digitalisation as there is a lack of broadband, which is crucial for companies' competitiveness and for people to be able to live in the region. The regions are not allowed to use Structural Funds for broadband expansion because the region is considered more developed than other regions the EU. The NSPA regions  receive important EU funds, but if the EU does not understand the NSPA's so-called geographical handicap, or special conditions, the NSPA cannot  address  the Structural Funds where they best benefit the NSPA and in the long run also the EU. 

Nils Kristian Sørheim Nilsen, head of North Norway's Brussels office, gave several examples of what the EU should  pay regard to in the revision of the Arctic Policy. First, the lack of critical mass and competence can be facilitated with state support. Secondly, indigenous Sami people need a common EU program to support different areas of development. Thirdly, continued promotion of cooperation in the Barents region to maintain relations with Russia is important. He also emphasized that the definition of Arctic research  must be broaden, as well as continue the investments in innovation systems such as testbeds for climate-related projects. 

Kari Aalto, Head of the East & North Finland Office in Brussels, stressed importance of a continued dialogue in which Arctic citizens are included  in discussions on the future development of the region. 

Mikael Janson, director at North Sweden  and the meeting chairman, stressed that the NSPA regions have great potential to further develop, however the regions are lacking critical mass do so effectively. The NSPA has much to offer the EU if they invest in the NSPA, Janson continued. He concluded by highlighting the final report produced based on the current Arctic Policy, the "EU Arctic Stakeholder Consultation Forum", which provides several concrete points for in-depth discussion of the EU's future investment priorities in the Arctic.

Read NSPA's position on the revision of  Arctic policy here.

Read more about the current EU Arctic Policy here.   

Read the report "EU Arctic Stakeholder Consultation Forum" here.